if you are a person with any kind of influence who cares about free speech, you need to stop explaining to people what is and is not a violation of the norm and start making the case — passionately — for its existence
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Say it while you can.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s more than a little sad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are a lot of smart people in the white house, how are they not seeing the long-term implications of stuff like that? Is it just groupthink or something else?
-
there are many smart people who believe in evil things
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can you imagine if Trump tried to do this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes. Litigation can also prevent this. There is a lot of 1st Amendment case law prohibiting government actors from coercing private entitites...if only there was a century-old organization with the guts, resources, and expertise willing to take on such a case....
End of conversation
-
-
-
and people will continue to cite the slippery slope fallacy as a reason why censorship is actually not happening or won’t lead to anything worse

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
