And the reasonable answer continues to be that they are extra-terrestrial or extra-dimensional, Mike. Please present me with another, reasonable alternative.
naturally occurring phenomenon that fundamentally alters our conception of physics
-
-
Mike come on, you're a smart guy whom I really do respect - genuinely. But what is naturally occurring about a craft that moves at crazy speeds and in wild directions with clearly intelligent drive? If you're suggesting some kind of 'time echo' or something - eh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No matter what they are, they'll fit that definition.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about a phenomenon that *doesn't* fundamentally alter our conception of physics? What about an image (of an object) that moves in ways that natural law, consistent with our conception of physics, would constrain the object itself from moving? What about a hologram?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mike why do you keep deleting your tweets on this topic? Nobody is going to think less of you because you’re a believer - it speaks to your intellectual curiosity. I came back because I wanted to elucidate further on the other point within this, the failing in the mediahttps://twitter.com/WBMason/status/1400774180044427265 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.