crazier thing about studies like this to me has always been the placebo group. should we not be further exploring the fact that belief in being healed itself appears to heal people?https://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/1389411338250715138 …
-
-
For sure, I'm aware of that. But the effect in the placebo group in this case was rather strong (for a reason), therefore I thought it was important to emphasize that. It would also be interesting to see how the two groups compare over time in this particular study.
-
What's particularly interesting is the effect of Open Label Placebos, when the patient actually knows that it's placebo. Here's a meta-study on the subject. It actually works in many cases.https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-83148-6 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We definitely should try to understand the mechanism in which belief (if that's the right word) alone tends to result in improved outcomes. It's free financially and free from side effects. Once we understand the physiology, could it be hacked (improvement without belief)?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Generative anthropological scapegoat = external vessel for mind-body ailment = placebo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's also conceivable that time passing is also healing in many matters. But your point is notable; thinking your taking something that's helping seems to be a powerful help.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So in that sense can you sell sugar pills and claim they cure PTSD, simply because of studies like these?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
