please keep in mind while voting that WHO researches asked people working in the lab if they had a leak and the people working in the lab said no, they did not have a leak
-
-
Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I put "lab escape" at about a trillion times more likely.https://twitter.com/jac5connor/status/1376558029504606210?s=21 …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Didn't South Park solve this? It was all Randy's fault
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The version I've found most convincing is that the zoonosis occurred during the virus collection process. Going into cave after cave of cold coronavirus laden air to collect bats with coronavirus, human lungs self select the most infectious variant. Technically not lab leak.
-
I’m no biologist but doesn’t this fail given there would be no selective pressure for the virus to mutate the covid spike in a cave only occasionally frequented by humans? Or, you need a species link like the once-theorized pangolins.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I'm old enough to remember when accounts were banned and censored last year for simply questioning this common sense likelihood
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
both are equally likely
-
Both are 50/50. It either happened or it didn’t.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I think at this point the zoonotic theory no longer uses wet market start but assumes undetected prior cases as known animal vectors dont get you to the wet market... but the core point on parsimony is right.
-
Also worth noting the lab leak case is easily disproved - an earlier case somewhere else is its fossil rabbit in the pre cambrian - so after a point absence of disproof becomes evidence.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
