billionaire media tycoon and mayor of san francisco. vp @foundersfund. ringleader @hereticon. editor-in-chief @piratewires 
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
It should be more concerning that the most photographed street in America is illegal to build. It should keep politicians up at night. We should all walk around with a little bit of embarrassment until it is solved.pic.twitter.com/h6jGtxxFRH
what about the street specifically is illegal to recreate? and how is this a federal policy???
Parking minimums, street widths, setback requirements, to name a few.
ADA compliance would be the Federal issue. The challenge on the state/local levels would be density and safety planning (e.g. road isn't wide enough for fire trucks to traverse). I think Simon's larger point is the default aesthetic poverty we've internalized as citizens.
i agree with the broader point, just genuinely curious
Non-compliant sidewalks would be the federal issue. Sidewalks basically have to be 4' wide. Concerns about accessibility for fire trucks result in insanely wide streets, although it is clear that there are work-arounds to this problem.
Um the ADA is a federal document. But technically you can build a ridiculously non compliant house as long as it is considered a non multi family. If it is turned into a multi family ( legally) and people rent it? That is when this *gestures* becomes a problem.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
