this equivalency is so insane. honestly what the fuck is wrong with these people? https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1357237501388283905 …pic.twitter.com/bTbZoD90Mv
Show this thread
-
should we dismantle private messaging platforms because someone, somewhere, may be spreading misinformation, a word for which we still refuse to provide a coherent and consistently-applied definition? "idk it's a little crazy but maybe! Lol" — the actual new york times
Show this thread
i'm sorry but anyone casually discussing whether or not we might "do something" about free people talking to each other privately on a messaging app is a fucking fascist, fuck off
-
-
Don’t apologize for this opinion. even if it is a facetious apology
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mike you seriously don’t think your group chats on iMessage shouldn’t be subject to censorship if they’re spreading misinformation? Can’t you stop your insane ideological defense of free speech and understand the harm you’re doing? The govt should monitor all of it. *sarcasm*
-
haha you've learned to label these
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is why a certain party in the govt wants to confiscate firearms. It's much easier to take away speech and privacy rights with an imbalance of power between the People and the public servants.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Elsewhere on Twitter I saw a complaint that illegal immigration "circumvents checks." The MSM regards encrypted messaging as a matter of circumventing checks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One could say refusing to act when confronted with the fact that criminals will use end-to-end encrypted messaging to boost the market for child sexual abuse content is also endorsing a form of oppression.
-
cool, that is illegal and those people should go to jail. you don't get to prohibit free people from talking to each other because a small fraction of people are evil. this is like ground floor liberal democracy shit.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Law Enforcement should have to obtain a warrant prior to intercepting and reviewing private communications, as per US Const 4A.
-
The 4th amendment has been on its death bed for awhile now
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.