This is weird, because don't both parties loathe the fairness doctrine because its repeal enabled their requisite propaganda outlets? Could this be that rare bird of a principled take from a politician? (However misguided as you mention.) Can't be.
-
-
-
it’s the authoritarian position tbh. though yes, technically a principle. really scraping the bottom of the barrel here...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No opinions outside the establishment allowed!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was created to suppress talk radio shows, will they expand it to podcasts?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doubt it could be applied to cable anyway. The constitutional justification for it was that the broadcasters were using the public airways so could be regulated in the public interest.
-
agree this would have a hard time holding up in court
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Let's steelman this though. Duverger's Law says that an FPTP system always stabilizes around two roughly equally sized coalitions. A rule like "no excommunicating the other coalition" might have pragmatic value.
-
(FWIW though I'm uncomfortable giving the govt the power to enforce that, for the obvious reasons)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The crazy thing is, if voters voted on issues not party/politician- it would be so much more productive. So much dumbassery in wanting to win rather than actually govern
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also important to remember there aren't any other sources of information other than those regulated by the FCC.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
