who is going to read all of these anti-tech substacks and subscription-based blogs? i truly don’t understand the target audience. the small fraction of unhappy tech workers? other writers? and how many are willing to pay?
-
I don’t understand the degree of frustration with the content. Doesn’t the ethical argument for disruptive technology rely on productive conflict? Why does the bi-directionally productive nature of that conflict stop with content?
when did i say i was frustrated with the content? i genuinely don't understand who's reading it.
-
-
My mistake, that same confusion is also argued by detractors. It seems like consumers don’t see the content as anti-tech generally but more issue-specific, and will consume content on bias, privacy, AI/ML ethics, etc w/o perceiving it as a condemnation of tech as a whole
-
Engineers at
@ProtonMail for instance will love the privacy content, but might ignore a piece from the same pub on how email hurts relationships.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.