sf supervisor in my mentions legitimately doesn’t seem to understand san francisco is in a state of decline. what possible hope do we have of fixing our problems when our elected officials can’t even see that our city is broken?https://twitter.com/MattHaneySF/status/1330930055078313986 …
-
Counter perspective: Many people see tech as ONLY adding tax revenue, but not culture, and don’t VALUE growth like you. They’re okay/happy if tech elite leaves if they don’t want to overcompensate via Tax for all the problems they bring: Traffic, gentrification, etc.
obsessed with the notion tech is responsible for problems in a city where housing is illegal and fentanyl addiction is encouraged
-
-
Tech can have nothing to do with housing and fentanyl and still not add to culture. I'm highlighting differences in values. As a Tech CEO, I don't think you're wrong ;), but if you don't see why the "other side" behaves the way they do, it will be hard to find a win-win.
-
Maybe publicly stated intentions are actually *wink wink* not the real intentions? SF isn’t alone here, other major US are at risk of losing the top 50-75% of their tax base. Which, maybe is the intention? Degentrification means rents collapse, but so does the city budget.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.