the new york post has been locked out of twitter for six days. i wrote about last week's historic act of censorship, a week of disastrous leadership from tech, the nature of truth, and our new bi-partisan, anti-tech political reality.https://solana.substack.com/p/zen-and-the-art-of-political-censorship …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @micsolana
“Biden, while serving as Vice President, pressured the Ukrainian government into firing a prosecutor investigating that same company.” Is a known falsehood/lie. Rs, Ds and foreign govs all agreed the prosecutor needed to be fired bc of his lack of investigating corruption.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @skodasays
Mike Solana Retweeted Alan Cole
Mike Solana added,
Alan ColeVerified account @AlanMColeTwitter doesn't actually understand the scope of the argument, and has misstated what the Washington Post and/or Joe Biden have actually said. Left is Twitter's summary of the Washington Post's article, right is the actual article. pic.twitter.com/uUyC7p2nTvShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @micsolana
did you not even read the tweet you just linked to? You get the quote from the article you pointed to proves I’m right right?
“Many western officials,” “actually was not investigating corruption,” “indeed, he was not investigating Burisma.”pic.twitter.com/u3XIvSJxuP
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @skodasays
the point i was making, correctly, in the graph you quoted from above, was that twitter incorrectly summarized the washington post's analysis of the new york post's story. attempt reading comprehension.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @micsolana
So you’re response to me saying the entire premise of your article is based off of an objective falsehood/ lie (that joe got the prosecutor fired bc he was looking into hunter and burisma) was to respond by saying Twitter once incorrectly summarized a Wapo article?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
i don't think joe biden had the prosecutor fired because of hunter, nor do i agree with the basic thrust of the new york post's story, and didn't base "the premise of my article," which you obviously don't understand, on that argument
-
-
Replying to @micsolana @skodasays
Just curious, who convinced Western officials that Shokin needed to go? After he was fired how did the new 'non corrupt' prosecutor progress the Burisma investigation? Think it was Shokins successors that watered down prosecutions and ultimately missed deadlines and closed case?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
