How about a tax on tech people who just arrived into the state, then got windfalls of 7-11+ figures when IPO? Why are you doing a class war thing in such a glass house?
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MarkTravis15, @micsolana ja
It’s more a class war to advocate for different taxation for different groups, as is the status quo. What is it about a person who bought their house 15 years ago that should give them a lower rate of taxation on their insanely valuable property?
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 9 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @zachtratar, @micsolana ja
Imagine a family who had a home in Atherton since the 50's when it was a dinky rural town, not the richest zip code on the planet. They're not computer programmers or experts in predicting stocks go up or down. Maybe a plumbers and a librarian. 2.5 kids, grown. 1/?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MarkTravis15, @zachtratar ja
There's no way they can move anywhere close to where they're living, but at least they can stay put for awhile. When the 2.5 kids have grown and they're ready to retire, they look elsewhere. Maybe they're tired of the traffic and the filth when they make it to The City. 2/?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MarkTravis15, @zachtratar ja
So, they sell their house for really massive profits, and get to move just about anywhere in the world to live comfortably to live out their golden years. Or maybe they have something to pass to their kids. 3/?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MarkTravis15, @zachtratar ja
Prop 13 helps these people stay in California. No, I don't want to increase their taxes. Instead, if you want things to be "fair", I suggest lowering taxes for new property owners to match that of the longer-term owners. 4/fin
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @jenneraub, @MarkTravis15 ja
To be clear, I'm also in favor of the "lower the taxes" strategy as well. This all being said, the taxes that need to be lowered/eliminated the most are income taxes on those making less than $60k/year. They should pay 0%-5% total, not 25%-35%.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @zachtratar, @jenneraub ja
agree, the question of whether taxes should be lowered broadly is a different question
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @micsolana, @zachtratar ja
I think what's going on is you don't want the legislature to go after tech windfalls, so you're teaming with public sector unions to extract from long-term California businesses instead. Why not encourage fiscal responsibility from the government instead?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
that’s... not what’s going on. and did you read the guide? i’m absolutely encouraging fiscal responsibility. equal treatment under the tax code isn’t “going after” someone.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @micsolana, @zachtratar ja
You’re using loaded rhetoric about Nancy Pelosi and landed gentry. Fair tax is an oxymoron. There’s no way to enforce fiscal responsibility by handing these politicians $billions.
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäysKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
