I would say I’m looking forward to all the “platforms need to censor themselves” people complaining every time they don’t agree with each particular act of self-censorship, but I’m not looking forward to it at all. It’s going to be super tedious and exhausting.
-
They always have been. What the fuck is a platform anyway?
-
-
This does not mean what you seen to think it means.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Downranking, on a private platform, is not censorship. Speech/reach. I can find the NYPost article just fine. I’m w you on a lot, Mike. Not here.
-
It is censorship, but it’s not government censorship. The Constitution protects your right to censor content in your publication, that is your speech, but protects you from the government censoring you.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Cox and Wyden wrote this bipartisan passage in 1996 in part to encourage market-based standards for user content so if you do not like the policies of a particular private corporation, you are free to go to another one, unless you’re saying you have no choice.
-
It should also be noted, 230 exists *specifically* to allow these publishers to censor speech without liability. They were worried that if companies didn’t have this ability, Prodigy & AOL would be awash in porn.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.