I feel everyone would be much more benefitted if they focused more on her specific philosophy and how she views the role of the different branches during the founding of the US compared to their functions now. But, I'll just keep wishing.
"how would you rule in this case?" "it would not be appropriate to say" "yes, of course, but how would you rule in this case?" 3 days of this
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Every congressional set piece has become an excuse to grandstand so that aides can edit the footage later and post to social media.
-
This is ultimately what happens when you create a situation where the biggest political challenge for congressional incumbents is the primary battle rather than the fight against opponents from the other party.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
but also "what do you think of existing law?" "no hypotheticals" "...that wasn't a hypothetical"
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Is there a way to ask the question such that it would get a meaningful answer? The fact that they’re not I think speaks a lot to what the goals of this procedure are. Still, Id at least be interested to know.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.