Because the breakdown in the rule of law means a transition to the rule of status. And they consider themselves more important than you.
-
-
-
This bill only applies to newspaper carriers and distributors, right? It’s not for writers and photogs.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hypocrisy along with a dose of paternalism that hurts the recipients.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The straw man is they think poor people aren't smart/well funded enough to freely enter into contracts, the steelman is the same in nicer words with better intentions
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Probably the same reason people want EVERYONE ELSE to pay taxes but want to pay none themselves...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can all the former drivers get their jobs back for their writing skills. Everyone is a journalist now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is coherent to think that more legal stringent protections are needed for worse-off employees, who have less bargaining power and knowledge of alternatives. Ex-Googlers working 80 hour weeks at a startup should not need protection from those workweeks, 13 year olds do.
-
I will never defend AB-5, but I think you're criticizing a distinction I think it is at least legitimate to draw.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They can’t
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.