This gets conflated every single time the general public, without fail.
wow the press is really just going to completely redefine our antitrust laws from “bad for consumers” to ”successful companies are illegal” and run with that until we all forget what’s real, huhhttps://twitter.com/sarahfrier/status/1313491916617646082 …
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
This goes back all the way to MSFT getting in trouble for giving away software for free.
-
No this goes all the way back to Standard Oil. Political retribution against JDR. JPM backed US Steel was far more monopolistic and never got any trouble.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Isn’t it bad for consumers though in this case?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
all I really care about is whether or not they’ve made their corporate BoD diversity quota for the year; if so, they become untouchable, printer goes brrrr
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
My cynical view is that it's especially about successful companies that threaten the media's business model. Oracle is very very successful, and often cartoonishly evil in its use of lawsuits, but gets almost no media attention because they don't compete for ad dollars
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Uhhhh im pretty sure facebook is bad for consumers. Of course its impossible to say either way definitively. But in this case, there’s some strong scandals pointing to anticompetitive behavior, no?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.