This gets conflated every single time the general public, without fail.
wow the press is really just going to completely redefine our antitrust laws from “bad for consumers” to ”successful companies are illegal” and run with that until we all forget what’s real, huhhttps://twitter.com/sarahfrier/status/1313491916617646082 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This goes back all the way to MSFT getting in trouble for giving away software for free.
-
No this goes all the way back to Standard Oil. Political retribution against JDR. JPM backed US Steel was far more monopolistic and never got any trouble.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Isn’t it bad for consumers though in this case?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
all I really care about is whether or not they’ve made their corporate BoD diversity quota for the year; if so, they become untouchable, printer goes brrrr
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My cynical view is that it's especially about successful companies that threaten the media's business model. Oracle is very very successful, and often cartoonishly evil in its use of lawsuits, but gets almost no media attention because they don't compete for ad dollars
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Uhhhh im pretty sure facebook is bad for consumers. Of course its impossible to say either way definitively. But in this case, there’s some strong scandals pointing to anticompetitive behavior, no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.