Perhaps our legislators could get back to legislating instead of nitpicking ‘sacrosanct’ rules to their own ends and outsourcing the lawmaking to unelected regulators and judiciaries
i don’t get it, what could possibly be so polarizing about an unelected, lifelong, de facto legislative body
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sarcasm level: 9000
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Weren’t you singing the praises of our anti-democratic “balance of powers” like 3 days ago?
-
Balance of power is undemocratic? I didn't realize we lived in a direct democracy?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It should be fixed terms of 18 years, staggered by 2 yrs each, so each 4-yr POTUS term gets to appoint 2 of them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not supposed to be a legislative body, but unfortunately it became one because of activist judges.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We should either have term limits or have minimum age for office as life expectancy - 10. You live longer? Good for you, you can keep your position
-
In Australia High Court justices are required by law to retire at 70. Protects against stacking and ensures they are all still at their most mentally acute.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
True but if Americans could vote for them, I don’t think I could handle reading the news about tweets from Chief Justice Johnny Knoxville.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.