Those some people often work on revolutionary "AI" automation products that are actually just an Amazon Turk jobs whitelabeled
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
'accurate?'
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
It's way off as far as the realistic embodiment. So the way it's least accurate is away from sex robots, so what would the average American say knowing that.
-
‘the way it learns’ is how i’ve most often heard it argued
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Humans S1/S2 -- spread the word!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Because Searle is widely recognized as bunk.
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
I'd probably be dust by then, but my scifi nightmare is that if we actually manage to engineer a Von Neumann probe , it's going to get a little too excited with its self-replication precepts. So when we send it off to colonize other planets, it's going to come back to colonize us
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
It’s way off-impossible for a lone engineer to do anything in secret. ‘Her’ is more likely; Alexa, Siri, and Assistant are evolving there. For robotics, TARS in ‘Interstellar’ is more likely.
-
Her is also IMO an equally bleak outcome for humanity. It's not that our creations seek to destroy us. We aren't worth the attention. It's as if we were stranded on a desert island & made a raft, but upon completion the raft decided there were more interesting things in the sea.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
