the new york times tech team truly never disappoints. prohibiting the censorious, authoritarian, literally genocidal chinese dictatorship from spying on U.S. citizens is... wait for it... “censorious” and “authoritarian”pic.twitter.com/LYUHgg2lWF
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Whether a govt can or not isn’t the question. They have the largest military in the world; of course they *can*. Does it raise questions of authoritarian censorship? To me, it definitely does. Who gets to decide which apps get banned and how is it enforced?
An embargo on a physical country, product, or service is one thing. Stepping into the web to somehow force all of the service providers to block/delete this app, seems authoritarian. I can’t criticize the NYT for that view.
An app is a service
“it considers” is the vulnerability the govt will exploit. Empirically, I see a lot to indicate they can't be trusted to decide which software is legal. One example: since the ‘90s, every few years they try to ban strong encryption. Steps like this are how they’ll get there.
We have all been so cleverly manipulated by rhetoric, possibly instigated by the CCP, so as to struggle mightily with what should be a simpler trade calculus. If US companies can’t operate in China, Chinese companies cannot presume to do so. That is all.
Presume to do so in the US, of course*
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.