NEW: Auditors sharply critique Facebook's history of decisions around decisions of speech on the platform, which they found were ‘Setbacks for Civil Rights' from a two-year study detailed in a 100-page report, a copy of which was obtained by the NYThttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/08/technology/facebook-civil-rights-audit.html …
-
-
Journalists are pushing facebook to make rules because they know they can't pass laws. To the extent that facebook is ubiquitous, they have the same result. And the principles behind why a new law wouldn't work still apply.
-
The people harmed by Facebook’s policies are the ones calling for reform. Plenty of speach is illegal (fraud, violent threats, libel) and Facebook already bans a wide variety of behavior, but it’s still haven for white supremacy and medical disinformation which is actively...
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
pretty sure the USDA will need to be silenced as well, given how well their recommended “food pyramid” diet has worked out for Americans. A bunch of violent criminals!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I don’t think social media platforms should allow the president to broadcast that the corona virus is a hoax without context, it’s too dangerous to public health
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
