both those subs were regularly breaking the site's rules, other smaller ones like these get banned all the time they only survived so long thanks to reddit being afraid to act, same for LSC
-
-
-
"regularly breaking the site's rules" is a kind of absurd criticism given the rules have actively changed while these subreddits existed.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Theyre not. Look at the list of books burned then look at that filth
-
One mans trash is another mans treasure.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I give reddit a lot of shit for various things, but both of subs actively encouraged TOS violations and had been flaunting the rules for years. I’m glad reddit enforces its (few) rules. I don’t see how this comparison applys here, especially since the admins warned themat they’d
-
warned, that they’d ban them for continued rule breaking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Are you implying that you think this action is on the side of burning books? Or just that one should keep that in mind when taking actions like this? Genuine question (I don't work on policy at reddit so I have no insight into these actions)
-
i think social media's aggressive political censorship is actually worse than book burning, which was gross but mostly just symbolic, and the tech industry's rapidly-vanishing liberalism is extremely dangerous. all of us should be pushing back.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
i'm not making a legal argument here, i'm making a moral argument
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
