agree antifa isn't actually autonomous in any meaningful sense of the word, but autonomy *is* their explicit intention. it was also the name they originally gave themselves. why are we catering to the evolving whims of a violent mob?
the twitter editorial team referring to chaz ("autonomous zone") as chop ("organized protest") strikes me as fairly straightforward propaganda in the service of a violent, far-left paramilitary movement now responsible for, among other things, murder
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
-
-
Yes. Maybe centralizing internet communication in the hands of a very few platforms was unwise, eh? It does produce revenue, though, so all good on that score.
-
a problem with no satisfying answers
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
It’s how the police dept and city govt are referring to it.
-
Hasn't the Seattle mayor been extremely encouraging about the whole endeavor though?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Even "CHOP" originally meant "Capitol Hill Occupied Protest", the new meaning was only pushed after someone with PR experience realized that calling something an occupation is a bad idea.
- Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Meh. The flip side is that CHOP suggests the French Revolution, which is similar to what this is.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.