billionaire media tycoon and mayor of san francisco. vp @foundersfund. ringleader @hereticon. editor-in-chief @piratewires 
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
this line stands out to me — i (& most studies) would say the internet has directly enabled the proliferation of extreme/socially unacceptable views & actions. but if you're more concerned with mobs on the timescale of days (which i disagree is more important) this doesn't matterpic.twitter.com/Rlsd30LuEZ
agree the internet has catalyzed a lot of dangerous extremism, and that's a problem. it's just separate from my central point, which is i think we're at legitimate ex-risk of total, instant global action on something both enraging and wrong.
in the piece you highlighted i'm trying to argue the specific nature of hysteria at global scale will be very hard (impossible?) to predict, so you can't really censor for it. the ex-risk is rapid onset madness we can't imagine, not specific ideas we mostly all hate.
yeah i don't disagree with you on that! the rapid onset waves are insane i do think your audience already focuses on that beyond the other issues and so personally i'd choose to balance it out more but it was a good piece on that topic. points to agree/disagree on constructively
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
