after much consideration i have decided i do in fact believe certain kinds of speech (employed by people i disagree with only) should be regulated, and twitter fact checking should be normalized. i propose a system of one fact checker. i will be the fact checker.
-
-
Replying to @micsolana
In what sense is Twitter fact checking regulating speech?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @moultano
separate but related concepts, and in any case i am not talking about state regulation. ty for your feedback, though. fyi all future feedback will be fact checked. unfactful opinions will be banned.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @moultano
i think the US is a phenomenal proxy on speech. if it's legal here, it should be legal on twitter.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @micsolana
How does that relate to putting a fact check in-line? Suppose they had a model where an algorithm picked the most credible reply to a Trump tweet, and displayed it below it. This would be clearly within their product charter. What's the material difference between that and this?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @moultano
your assumption trump is wrong and a credible voice you agree with should therefore have some authority over his opinion or how it is presented stems from your political bias, a bias we all have, and is precisely why we should oppose such regulations
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @micsolana
Twitter already has total authority over how his opinion is presented.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
yes agree they've gone too far! they should absolutely liberalize.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.