after much consideration i have decided i do in fact believe certain kinds of speech (employed by people i disagree with only) should be regulated, and twitter fact checking should be normalized. i propose a system of one fact checker. i will be the fact checker.
-
What do you think twitter should do?
i think the US is a phenomenal proxy on speech. if it's legal here, it should be legal on twitter.
-
-
How does that relate to putting a fact check in-line? Suppose they had a model where an algorithm picked the most credible reply to a Trump tweet, and displayed it below it. This would be clearly within their product charter. What's the material difference between that and this?
-
your assumption trump is wrong and a credible voice you agree with should therefore have some authority over his opinion or how it is presented stems from your political bias, a bias we all have, and is precisely why we should oppose such regulations
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
That is enforcing free speech restrictions on twitter.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.