There is a cost in life to “staying inside forever” too, but that group isn’t being honest about it either.
-
-
-
The cost of this path will be like the line in The Sun Also Rises about how one goes bankrupt “gradually and then suddenly.”
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not sure if they don't and they're just stupid or they do and they're dishonest about it or if they do and they actually prefer it that way for revolution's sake
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It’s the Age of False Choices.
End of conversation
-
-
-
The answer is in the 90% middle ground but the 5% on each fringe are sucking up all the oxygen. Par for the course on Twitter.
-
*and politics
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Stop conflating stay inside forever with stay inside for another 3 to 6 mo. The supply chain can almost certainly take that. Surely 2yrs would mean economic oblivion. Im sure as hell not advocating that. With so many scientific/economic unknowns, haphazard reopening is foolish.
-
if we stay inside another 6 months (?!) we will absolutely slip into a global depression, supply chains will be compromised, and probably millions or tens of millions of people will lose reliable access to, among everything else, food. fuel. medicine.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Exactly! Who specifically is saying "stay inside forever?"
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
