There is a cost in life to “staying inside forever” too, but that group isn’t being honest about it either.
the “open up the economy” ppl seem to understand there’s a cost in life associated with their preferred policy, they just aren’t being honest about it. do the “stay inside forever” people understand what happens when our supply chains fail?
-
-
-
The cost of this path will be like the line in The Sun Also Rises about how one goes bankrupt “gradually and then suddenly.”
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I'm not sure if they don't and they're just stupid or they do and they're dishonest about it or if they do and they actually prefer it that way for revolution's sake
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
It’s the Age of False Choices.
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
The answer is in the 90% middle ground but the 5% on each fringe are sucking up all the oxygen. Par for the course on Twitter.
-
*and politics
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Stop conflating stay inside forever with stay inside for another 3 to 6 mo. The supply chain can almost certainly take that. Surely 2yrs would mean economic oblivion. Im sure as hell not advocating that. With so many scientific/economic unknowns, haphazard reopening is foolish.
-
if we stay inside another 6 months (?!) we will absolutely slip into a global depression, supply chains will be compromised, and probably millions or tens of millions of people will lose reliable access to, among everything else, food. fuel. medicine.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Exactly! Who specifically is saying "stay inside forever?"
Keskustelun loppu
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.