I always go back to my "Philosophy of Thought" professor who lectured that opinions must be based on the weighting of facts. Very often these experts select 'facts' with flawed metadata characteristics. I wish the debate would start with the appropriate selection of data
the problem with expert opinions is experts have opinions... about politics, culture, society. and for every “expert” you can cite, i can cite another one in conflict. none of us are free of bias, we have to think for ourselves.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure what to tell you other than this is playing Russian Roulette while putting more rounds in the chamber each year. The downside is simply nuts, and the odds keep growing for the downside.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Expert Political Judgement Lot to unpack.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One of my favorite quotes from Idiocracy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Love this quote
@naval shared: “Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. When someone says 'science teaches such and such', he is using the word incorrectly.” - Richard FeynmanThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. But sometimes experts have more respectable methods or approaches, or a better track record. Expert opinion is mostly extremely valuable when there is a consensus among them (even when there isn't fact to prove them right).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sometimes real 'common sense' seems like the ability to acknowledge ignorance and integrate/ignore data from the endless domain experts
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.