I have a lot of evidence that this is where it mutated, and some evidence that the virus was created, but elsewhere. The former is publicly available information!
no one serious thinks the virus was “created” in the narrow sense implied below. the wuhan lab was conducting extremely dangerous gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses — we *know* this. the question is, did a virus get out? something many have worried about for years.https://twitter.com/NBCNewsWorld/status/1255991607473721345 …
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
“paid them to do it” is a bit of a stretch. we provided some funding. what was the *total* funding?
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
They have been running this conflation smear since the beginning. When
@TomCottonAR said we need to find out if this escaped from a lab or not, the media all reported that he thinks it is a man-made bioweapon, quoting "experts" to condemn a claim that was never made.Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
what you are saying makes no sense. "gain of function" means genetic modification in literal sense. If you *know* that what was happening then you *must* believe it is man-made too and not just original virus in its natural state. You cannot argue both ways.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Media making a clever play with the language to make the claim appear invalid: “originated” and “escaped” does not = “created”. Likely they were studying a naturally occurring novel virus there.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.