I know we're not supposed to say it out loud because the virus might be listening but it is actually very very very not-constitutional for the mayor to make having a friend over a crime
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Supreme Court disagrees
-
-
Also...is it actually in the interest of public health? That seems material. If people are either nowhere near others or have a mask/sanitizer/gloves/etc, are they actually a serious public health risk?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Previous quarantine measures before the US SCT involved international and interstate travel bans by States. The 1st and 14th Amend guarantee "the right of the people peaceably to assemble" The 5th and 14th Amend prohibit "deprived of ... liberty ... without due process of law"
-
Sweden made the correct choice BEST POLICY 1. Quarantine the sick (ppl w/ SARS II symptoms) 2. Support Hospitals w/ PPE etc 3. Allow at risk to Voluntarily Self Quarantine OPEN ECONOMY
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.