This is a fascinating comment in the Economist. It seems obviously wrong, and (they claim) an opinion held by an entire profession. A carbon tax seems like a very good way of partially solving the problem...pic.twitter.com/41WyHKuIjZ
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I think it's better to go to the source on trying to understand the future prospects. I've been (very!) slowly digging my way into the scientific literature, trying to understand the range, the key unknowns, etc...
I see a carbon tax as a way of letting banking solve the barriers to nuclear. If you know you'll have a sustained price advantage forever, you can get billion dollar projects built.
more of a subsidy for solar / wind (in addition to outright solar / wind subsidies)
+1 geo engineering in the mix. We already do it. Let’s just be clear on intentions.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.