billionaire media tycoon and mayor of san francisco. vp @foundersfund. ringleader @hereticon. editor-in-chief @piratewires 
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
This is a fascinating comment in the Economist. It seems obviously wrong, and (they claim) an opinion held by an entire profession. A carbon tax seems like a very good way of partially solving the problem...pic.twitter.com/41WyHKuIjZ
more important question is why are we talking to economists rather than nuclear scientists and geoengineers?
100% agree. This is a trend in this space. Think tanks & economists, when it needs geo engineering science & agriscience
Because at the end of the day the primary objective isn't scientific. It's economic. Those who seek to control a bigger slice of the $ pie will use any lever they can sell to the public.
Curious on two questions: (1) Why do you think nuclear has stagnated so much since the early 80s (when capacity pretty much maxed out)? What can be done to shift that? [I'd love a good answer! I've spent a lot of time searching for one.]pic.twitter.com/pomMuNCnvl
(2) How to do governance for geoengineering? It seems super-hard, e.g., issues around the south asian monsoon, ocean acidification, etc. Not asking for a comprehensive answer - I don't think one is known! But if you have heard of good ideas, I'd love to know!
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
