Those awards emerged pre-internet when content discovery/distribution was necessarily more tethered to broadcast media & had more time to be venerable. Curating who votes & by what standards are framed more as a brand now & offer denominating “knowledge.” Not default prestigious
the answer to this question contains the key to whatever black magic it is that keeps the new york times alive
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My uninformed guess: legacy belief that expert curation yields better results when judging an art. And it might in some cases. Would a popular vote yield the right National Medal of Science winner? Or do too few peeps have 'taste' in mathematics, for instance, to have opinion?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.