separately, let's lose this "we" frame. space accounts for a small fraction of global spending. it has nothing to do with our inability to realize whatever version of utopia it is you're selling, and "we" don't have to go anywhere. if you don't want to go to mars, stay home.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can we stop with the colonizing and perhaps undo some of the last couple hundred years of colonization?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
sounds like something you care about, and should definitely *yourself* focus on rather than mars
- Show replies
-
-
-
Do we have technology to get past the Van Allen Belt?
-
Plastic with expanding loop life sustaining systems
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If we want to colonize effectively, we need to move past rockets. The technology is here today but locked up in USAPs in the govt. "We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects" - Ben Rich, CEO of Lockheed Skunk Works
-
I agree we should absolutely keep working on this stuff — and all of the new thrust tech is really exciting, at least theoretically — but we can and should also start colonizing now
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
