billionaire media tycoon and mayor of san francisco. vp @foundersfund. ringleader @hereticon. editor-in-chief @piratewires 
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
It’s just much more cost efficient to help people in need, compared to the costs of high crime rates, suicides and sprawling homelessness. In Denmark it’s not a oppressive ‘communist’ government, but a democratic decision, by the people, to live in a healthy and generous society
not talking about cost efficiency, i'm talking about language. you can live in a society that provides everyone housing. but to call it a "human right" negates rights to property, self, and association, and so the concept itself of human rights.
Correct. Housing (shelter), just like food, medical care, water, and air, constitute Necessities. We can allow free market or welfare to provide these, but not Rights. Fundamental Rights include Life (Right to Live), Liberty (Right to Act), and Property (Right to Exclude).
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
