While I still disagree with her stance, the translation and key points of the quote aren’t accurate and aren’t what she said.
-
-
-
is she not suggesting a regulation on speech here? https://twitter.com/ionaitalia/status/1200484827889328134?s=21 …
This Tweet is unavailable. - 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
right, b and c (paradox of tolerance) are the most compelling cases against speech imo, but the line is still clear: abridging speech should never happen, *talking about* abridging speech is annoying but needs to be legal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
Imagine an American learns a foreign language for once and actually understands what they're commenting on.
-
germany already has laws against free expression. this is not a matter lost in translation.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Completely misleading and wrong translation of what she actually said. Why do you spread fake news like this?
-
*sigh. the OP quoted here is clearly paraphrasing to make a point... about a policy that literally already exists. there’s nothing fake about german laws against free speech. read something.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
