hypothetically speaking, if you knew going into a job that smoking tons of weed and ripping shots of tequila at your desk was the CEO-endorsed culture of the office, and you consented... what would actually be wrong with that?
Show this thread
-
isn't the argument basically that it shuts out people who don't want to do that. freedom of association is a niche perspective compared to minimizing barriers to participation
freedom of association isn’t a niche perspective, it’s an inalienable natural right
-
-
I'd agree with you if we lived in the 19th century because natural law is a cool bulwark for societal norm erosion but by now enough positivists have votes and guns that none of that matters anymore
-
it's inalienable if you can defend it
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
at the bottom, there is no freedom of association to an extent. If theres a job and someones paying, you take the job because otherwise you starve. You're only ever as free as your least free participant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.