Show this thread
hypothetically speaking, if you knew going into a job that smoking tons of weed and ripping shots of tequila at your desk was the CEO-endorsed culture of the office, and you consented... what would actually be wrong with that?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm here for the replies
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds like a perk
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
isn't the argument basically that it shuts out people who don't want to do that. freedom of association is a niche perspective compared to minimizing barriers to participation
-
more extreme example: pretty sure the people upset over zenefits employees fucking in the stairwells were not the people fucking in the stairwells
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'd have concerns that people aren't fully productive at work
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It makes it harder to make money. Also being drunk gets boring.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Precisely nothing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t think anything is morally wrong with it, but I do think a CEO who breaks international, federal, and state law on the regular is a huge risk. The company is bound to attract functional and non-functional addicts. Related: guessing the health insurance costs would be high.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.