But - then why even try to fix climate? Then we must believe we can get to singularity / extreme longevity within 50 years.
-
-
-
Not telling people to have children is like telling them to use less plastic - only a few will listen right away and it will take decades to see true change. During that time, our global reproduction rate will plateau by itself as written by
@businesshttps://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-global-fertility-crash/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree in principle, but since antinatalism is purely cultural and not genetic, I’m not sure it would do much good. The only fix is cultural.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's convenient how people love to tell others they shouldn't have kids/shouldn't be allowed kids to save the planet through population control yet they still burden the planet with their own presence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Context is king. Why create more of sth we have an abundance of (orphans)? Why nowadays have more than 1 biological child, when living in a materialistic consumer country, where each child has an ecological footprint of 10 children in a non materialistic consumer country?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem starts in "save the planet": If the planet is in danger than the eradication of civilization is the obvious wish. But ecological change is not a threat to the planet, the planet will prevail, it is a treat to civilization. So this is just the dumbest form of suicide.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.