I agree in principle, but since antinatalism is purely cultural and not genetic, I’m not sure it would do much good. The only fix is cultural.
i agree proponents of this worldview should stop having childrenhttps://twitter.com/nypost/status/1191876047320600576 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's convenient how people love to tell others they shouldn't have kids/shouldn't be allowed kids to save the planet through population control yet they still burden the planet with their own presence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem starts in "save the planet": If the planet is in danger than the eradication of civilization is the obvious wish. But ecological change is not a threat to the planet, the planet will prevail, it is a treat to civilization. So this is just the dumbest form of suicide.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Context is king. Why create more of sth we have an abundance of (orphans)? Why nowadays have more than 1 biological child, when living in a materialistic consumer country, where each child has an ecological footprint of 10 children in a non materialistic consumer country?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But - then why even try to fix climate? Then we must believe we can get to singularity / extreme longevity within 50 years.
-
Not telling people to have children is like telling them to use less plastic - only a few will listen right away and it will take decades to see true change. During that time, our global reproduction rate will plateau by itself as written by
@business https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-global-fertility-crash/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.