billionaire media tycoon and mayor of san francisco. vp @foundersfund. ringleader @hereticon. editor-in-chief @piratewires 
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Okay, but what are some non-legislative ways to disincentivize the equally insidious rhetoric fueling, for instance, acts of domestic terror?
in many states the disincentive for acts of domestic terror is the death penalty. i'm not sure that's the perfect solution, but it's certainly a more reasonable place to begin this conversation than "let's be china."
Is the death penalty at all effective in deterring acts of terror? I’ve not seen research to that effect. And if your logic is that the threat of legal punishment deters antisocial behavior, haven’t you just argued against yourself?
I’m not trying to be a smartass, honestly. I hear this kind of anti-censorship argument all the time (who on Twitter hasn’t?), but I rarely hear alternatives. Maybe you or one of your followers has some ideas?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
