increasingly the argument for censorship is "europe does it." I would remind pro-censorship activists europe is also the continent of marx and hitler, and there are literal members of the nazi party still alive in germany today. in liberty, americans do not follow. we lead.
-
-
Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Okay, but what are some non-legislative ways to disincentivize the equally insidious rhetoric fueling, for instance, acts of domestic terror?
-
in many states the disincentive for acts of domestic terror is the death penalty. i'm not sure that's the perfect solution, but it's certainly a more reasonable place to begin this conversation than "let's be china."
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I really hope they name it the Sedition Act.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
It runs real security risks, too. Militias looked like crazy people in the 90's. In an environment where the NYT and Washington Post are advocating to end the First Amendment, the stigma fades away rapidly.
-
You could imagine a flashpoint: court orders someone not to speak, militias protect the speaker. 1/2 the country would support them. You don't want 1/2 the nation in favor of vigilantes. You also don't want the 1st Amendment to get reduced The whole situation is a powder keg
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The body count of too-little-censorship is in the 10s, even imagining that censorship will stop all domestic terrorism. The body count of too much censorship will get to the 100000s when they start censoring discussion of public health, foreign affairs, econ, etc. Google Uyghurs.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
@governorwatts this guy wrote this op-ed for youKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
