The scary thing about the current tech boom is that it took the current tech boom just to *run in place* against SF’s unfunded pension liabilities. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/amp/SF-taking-steps-to-avoid-projected-future-budget-13509714.php … https://twitter.com/zck/status/1187491641478664193 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Because of the California rule, which protects already-awarded pension plans from renegotiation, cities can only either raise tax revenue or cannibalize existing services to keep up with liabilities. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article236610128.html …pic.twitter.com/w0WT2TvkVr
4 replies 3 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
So if SF’s economy doesn’t grow as fast as it did over the last decade, boosting the city budget from ~$6 to 12B (which also created lots of other negative impacts around displacement), it will have to cut services substantially.
6 replies 4 retweets 44 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
Wait until people realize how much of the state budget depends on the cap gains from startups millionaires and billionaires.
3 replies 3 retweets 72 likes -
Replying to @rabois @kimmaicutler
SF comes close to being the city version of Softbank funded mismanaged startup!
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likes
sf is worse than softbank
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.