The people banned from other conferences are normally banned for harassing people, being sexist, racist or attacking vulnerable people. People who don’t like conferences with “safe spaces” don’t like conferences that have no tolerance policies on racism, sexism, homophobia etc.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @tomcoates ja @zebulgar
1/ For now we don’t even know who will be speaking and yet a lot of people seem to already have a strong opinion on quality, their views etc. I honestly believe that
@zebulgar wouldn’t like my views or would call me a commie, I don’t agree with things@PalantirTech might be doing1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @KarolRychwalski, @tomcoates ja
2/ but looking at
@foundersfund portfolio there’s plenty of companies I think no one would call racist, sexist etc -@Affirm@Spotify@DeepMindAI and so on - so they prob deserve to at least wait for the speakers to be announced before everyone dives into 2 min of hate right away2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 8 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
oh, you’re mistaken, we no longer count as gay once we *checks notes* host a conference including topics such as gene editing, transhumanism, and LITERALLY DRAG CULTURE
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
