Just heard an NPR promo for a segment on the 1619 Project that went something like "Some say it's important. Some say it's an insult." Reminded me that both-sides-ism isn't always about fake balance. Sometimes it's about creating the appearance of controversy for clicks/ratings
how is it not controversial? i genuinely thought that was the purpose of the nyt framing. npr coverage seems reasonable imo.
-
-
#1619Project isn’t that controversial. Is literal American history.Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
There are a lot of topics with “controversies” where it doesn’t make sense to make the controversy the focus of coverage, because it’s so dumb or one-sided. Eg. Whether vaccines cause autism, whether the earth is flat, etc
-
“People who don’t like the New York Times or talking about racism don’t like how the New York Times talked about racism” isn’t a controversy, it’s a tautology
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.