the left doesn’t seem to understand what legal intervention here would look like. if the gov steps in social media platforms will not become *more* censorious, they’ll be forced to liberalize. any speech short of an explicit incitement to violence is constitutionally protected.https://twitter.com/mariachong/status/1137034789087670272 …
-
...or precedent that private parties like Starbucks or Twitter or me at Thanksgiving are compelled to allow a virulent homophobic racist to shout slurs at other patrons, users and guests on the principle of the “censorship” boogeyman.
there is something of a slight difference between your living room and the globally-scaled, monopoly technology apparatus by which we publicly disseminate speech
-
-
Sure. I agree that the monopolistic nature of the tech giants make this much more complex. If there were four equal-in-scope YouTubes, this conversation would be more simple. I still think egregious harassment can be banned.
-
Bc you're for censorship of speech you dislike Maria.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.