A hundred years from now, we’ll have a better understanding of the actual limitations of the laws of physics. Maybe 50-70 years ago, we did too, in a few places, that made sure ICBM’s stayed hard to build. Made sure only the US and Russia could build em. Guess who’s fighting.
*dips toe into conspiracy pond* here’s the thing: our pilots have been seeing UFOs for decades. at what point should we expect our ‘top secret military program’ to start checking local flight schedules before running tests that defy the laws of physics?https://twitter.com/michaelshermer/status/1133113292900012033 …
-
-
-
It’s a little awkwardly noticeable that Newton’s Third Law (for every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction) long predates relativity (reactions do not happen at the same time as actions). Equal can distribute, but *opposite* is another matter. Opposite to which state?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Mirages must be considered, specially by a propable internal reflection index of the atmosphere that reflects lights on the ground high up in the atmosphere under special conditions, but aliens should never be ruled out even if i find them to be a remote possibility.
-
A Mirage could also be a french fighter jet.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"A sphere encasing a cube." Built by Raytheon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's sad seeing people's irrational reactions of denial & confirmation to this phenomena which needs to be properly scientifically investigated instead of throwing out answers like "mirage or top secret aircraft or drones or ETs". We simply don't know so let's proper science
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.