A hundred years from now, we’ll have a better understanding of the actual limitations of the laws of physics. Maybe 50-70 years ago, we did too, in a few places, that made sure ICBM’s stayed hard to build. Made sure only the US and Russia could build em. Guess who’s fighting.
*dips toe into conspiracy pond* here’s the thing: our pilots have been seeing UFOs for decades. at what point should we expect our ‘top secret military program’ to start checking local flight schedules before running tests that defy the laws of physics?https://twitter.com/michaelshermer/status/1133113292900012033 …
-
-
-
It’s a little awkwardly noticeable that Newton’s Third Law (for every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction) long predates relativity (reactions do not happen at the same time as actions). Equal can distribute, but *opposite* is another matter. Opposite to which state?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Mirages must be considered, specially by a propable internal reflection index of the atmosphere that reflects lights on the ground high up in the atmosphere under special conditions, but aliens should never be ruled out even if i find them to be a remote possibility.
-
A Mirage could also be a french fighter jet.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
It's sad seeing people's irrational reactions of denial & confirmation to this phenomena which needs to be properly scientifically investigated instead of throwing out answers like "mirage or top secret aircraft or drones or ETs". We simply don't know so let's proper science
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.