uber never asked the government for permission to exist, and the media has never forgiven them. two questions in descending order of importance: 1. had uber asked permission, would they today exist? 2. if such permission is expected for legal behavior, what is freedom?
-
-
Replying to @micsolana
It's one thing to push boundaries and challenge the status quo. There would be only incremental innovation if not. It's another thing to blindly break rules. The legal framework is also in place to protect freedom of others and not let the bullies decide what happens.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @pomgod @micsolana
Exactly. Dockless or free floating devices are a blatant misuse of public infrastructure. Not just any infrastructure, our most valuable and congested infrastructure. Dockless is not scalable. Dockless is not profitable. Micro mobility is here to stay but dockless is not
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @CrabScooters @pomgod
ah, misunderstood - carry on!
9:42 AM - 14 May 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
