there are many things facebook isn't legally allowed to do. why would we draw the line at monopolizing the public square, and deleting free speech?
it’s a hopeful libertarian argument questioning, i think, the point at which fb actually becomes a content provider by engaging in censorship. and if they are able to censor some (legal) things they don’t like, why not the illegal things they aren’t currently liable for.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Basically, yes.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
