billionaire media tycoon and mayor of san francisco. vp @foundersfund. ringleader @hereticon. editor-in-chief @piratewires 
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I'm often asked why rigid commitment to political language matters. If in saying “socialism” ppl mean “liberalism with high taxation” why not accept the new definition? But turn that question around. Why, given its deadly history, is the socialist not disenamored of the word?
Imagine a fascist attempt to define "real Nazism" as some middle way between freedom and literal Nazism. We would never accept such a redefinition of our language because the propagandist's motivation would be clear — Nazism.
Language is the air we breathe. When corrupted, there is no logical argument for freedom that can save us.https://medium.com/@micsolana/conquering-cerberus-a6d760c7ad9a …
Totally agree. These changing definitions also let opponents fear monger nothingness.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
