I'm often asked why rigid commitment to political language matters. If in saying “socialism” ppl mean “liberalism with high taxation” why not accept the new definition? But turn that question around. Why, given its deadly history, is the socialist not disenamored of the word?
-
-
Language is the air we breathe. When corrupted, there is no logical argument for freedom that can save us.https://medium.com/@micsolana/conquering-cerberus-a6d760c7ad9a …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Totally agree. These changing definitions also let opponents fear monger nothingness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
