Imagine a fascist attempt to define "real Nazism" as some middle way between freedom and literal Nazism. We would never accept such a redefinition of our language because the propagandist's motivation would be clear — Nazism.
Show this thread
I'm often asked why rigid commitment to political language matters. If in saying “socialism” ppl mean “liberalism with high taxation” why not accept the new definition? But turn that question around. Why, given its deadly history, is the socialist not disenamored of the word?
-
-
-
Language is the air we breathe. When corrupted, there is no logical argument for freedom that can save us.https://medium.com/@micsolana/conquering-cerberus-a6d760c7ad9a …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.