frame is less liberalism vs. socialism than growth vs. stasis. socialists once believed their system compatible with growth, which history unquestionably disproved. socialists now link stasis with morality — less a danger to us extra-nationally, catastrophic at home.
-
I’m not sure i buy this. If anything growth has slowed down in the last decade or so. In living memory we’ve got Japan’s industrialization, China’s, 30+ years of full force Moore’s law, dramatic expansion of air travel downmarket, etc. what’s bigger than all that today?
-
-
Damn beat me to it... just pulled my phone back out to mea culpa “oh right, a billion+ pocket computers”
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Yes. Technological and scientific growth has been parabolically up-and-to the right for 20+ years since mobile, social, and cloud became infrastructural to the internet. See here: https://ourworldindata.org/technological-progress …
-
*blergh "... became infrastructural to the [application development]" return editTweets == false :(
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.