there’s *some* additional nuance in the piece, but the headline language is an ironically a-scientific, religious position. it can not become the way we talk about the natural world.
Show this thread
in terms of not debating the “scientific worldview” — paradigmatic shifts in our scientific understanding of the world occur often (cosmology, germ theory, evolution, general relativity). new and important ideas are almost never welcome (from other scientists!)https://twitter.com/DrKateMarvel/status/1080915865854509056 …
-
-
-
to the scary topic in question — planet’s warming! — i agree the evidence indicates an alarming trend. so instead of outlining rules for defending orthodoxy, it’s time to start outlining strategy for large-scale carbon sequestration. let’s be geoengineers
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.